Speed, Security, and Adoption Compared

By Sally Rufus, updated July 21, 2025

In the world of crypto, speed and security are everything—especially when it comes to DeFi (decentralized finance). Two blockchains are now emerging as top contenders for the fastest and most secure DeFi platforms: TON (The Open Network) and Solana. The TON vs Solana DeFi race is heating up, with both built for scalability but taking very different paths. So which one comes out on top?

Let’s break it down in simple terms.

What is TON?

TON started as a project by Telegram but has evolved into a decentralized ecosystem run by the community. It’s known for its strong integration with Telegram, one of the most popular messaging apps globally, which gives it instant access to millions of users.

TON is built for mass adoption, aiming to make crypto simple and fast for everyday users. It supports smart contracts, NFTs, DEXs, and more. Its latest upgrades aim to support high transaction speeds with strong security features.

What is Solana?

Solana is a high-performance blockchain launched in 2020. It’s famous for speed and low fees, with over 2,000 transactions per second (TPS) in real-world scenarios. It uses a unique Proof-of-History (PoH) mechanism alongside Proof-of-Stake (PoS), which helps the network verify transactions faster. In the growing TON vs Solana DeFi debate, Solana is often highlighted for its proven ability to handle large-scale DeFi activity efficiently.

Solana is already home to many DeFi projects, including DEXs, lending platforms, and yield farms. It has a large developer community and strong VC backing, which helps its growth and security upgrades.

Speed: Who’s Faster?

Solana’s Speed

Solana has built a reputation for being fast—really fast. It theoretically supports up to 65,000 TPS, although real-world numbers are often lower. Transactions are usually confirmed in under a second.

TON’s Speed

TON is also incredibly fast, thanks to its multi-threaded architecture. It can process millions of transactions per second in theory by splitting the blockchain into shards that process data in parallel. TON’s developers claim it can scale automatically as traffic increases.

Winner: On paper, TON might handle more transactions in the long run due to its sharding model. But today, Solana has a proven record of handling thousands of DeFi transactions daily at high speed.

Security: How Safe Are They?

Solana’s Security

Solana has had its share of security issues. In 2022 and 2023, multiple DeFi hacks occurred on Solana-based platforms. Some issues were due to bugs in smart contracts; others were from third-party integrations. While Solana’s core is solid, the fast pace of development sometimes leaves security behind.

That said, the Solana team actively works on improvements and recently launched upgrades to prevent spam and reduce the impact of outages.

TON’s Security

TON benefits from a smaller but tightly integrated ecosystem. Because it’s built to scale slowly and securely within the Telegram environment, it hasn’t seen as many hacks. Its smart contract system, written in FunC, is new and designed to be secure by default. However, the lower number of DeFi apps means it’s been less battle-tested than Solana.

Winner: If we’re talking about real-world stress testing, Solana has the edge—but it has scars to prove it. TON is more cautious and integrated, which may lead to stronger security over time as it grows.

Ecosystem and Adoption

Solana has been around longer and has a larger DeFi ecosystem, with popular apps like Jupiter, Marinade, Drift, and Orca. It also has NFT marketplaces, launchpads, and GameFi projects.

TON, on the other hand, is growing rapidly. Its connection to Telegram gives it a massive user base. With mini-apps, wallets, and bots inside Telegram, users don’t even need to leave the app to start using DeFi. That’s a huge UX advantage.

Winner: Solana wins for depth and maturity. TON wins for potential mass adoption.

Gas Fees and User Experience

Solana fees are extremely low—often less than $0.01. This makes it great for high-frequency trading and small transactions.

TON fees are also low and benefit from in-app experiences via Telegram bots. You can swap tokens or use a DeFi app inside Telegram in seconds. This level of convenience may give TON an edge in onboarding new users.

Winner: TON wins for user experience, while Solana wins for DeFi-specific tools and developer maturity.

Final Verdict: TON or Solana?

So, which DeFi ecosystem is faster and safer?

• Speed: Solana wins today, but TON may scale better in the future.

• Security: Solana has more experience (and more attacks), while TON is newer but cautious.

• Adoption: Solana is mature; TON is growing fast thanks to Telegram.

• User Experience: TON is smoother for beginners; Solana is better for advanced DeFi users.

If you’re a developer or DeFi pro, Solana gives you more tools and dApps today.

If you’re new to crypto or want seamless Telegram integration, TON is worth watching.

In the end, both ecosystems have huge potential. TON may bring in mass adoption, while Solana keeps pushing the limits of performance. The TON vs Solana DeFi comparison highlights how different approaches can lead to strong results in speed, security, and usability. The real winner? The users—because more options mean more innovation.